Search
Advanced Search
Share this Article info
  • Facebook StumbleUpon Connotea CiteULike Bibliography

Open Access

Correspondence

Nanotechnology-Related Environment, Health, and Safety Research

Giovanni Brandi, Elisabetta Nobili, Stefania Di Girolamo, Gianluca Grazi, Michelangelo Fiorentino, Rita Golfieri, Guido Biasco

S. Orsola – Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, E-mail:giovanni.brandi@unibo.it

We were very interested to read the article by Schmidt (2009) about the increasing number of nanomaterials and their potential effects. We were especially interested in the similarities between carbon nanotubes and chrysotile asbestos fibers. The widespread use of asbestos-like substances with similar putative carcinogenic potential could result in the development of other unexpected types of cancer.

The potential carcinogenic risk of nano-materials that are structurally similar to asbestos and have been used in many industrial fields in the last few years has been highlighted by Carter (2008). Some studies conducted in animal models suggest that nanomaterials cause free radical–mediated cellular DNA damage and consequently have an asbestos-like carcinogenic action (Poland et al. 2008).

In addition to mesothelioma (the typical cancer index of exposure) or lung cancer, asbestos can cause other types of cancer. On the basis of our clinical experience, we hypothesize that at least a portion of bile ducts cancers (i.e., cholangiocarcinomas) are caused by exposure to this known carcinogenic agent.

From 2002 to 2008 we treated 258 patients with cholangiocarcinoma at our institute. Over the previous year, we carefully interviewed 66 consecutive patients using a standardized questionnaire asking about their exposure to asbestos and other known risk factors linked to bile duct carcino genesis (Khan et al. 2008). We collected each patient’s remote, recent, and occupational clinical history. In addition to the association with known risk factors for the onset of cholangiocarcinoma, we assessed occupational or household exposure to asbestos in 24 patients, 10 of whom did not have other certain risk factors (Table 1; Brandi et al. 2008).

Asbestos fibers cause cancer through chronic inflammation, amplifying the production of oxygen radicals, cytokines, growth factors, and proinflammatory factors responsible for both impaired antioxidant and control cell proliferation and apoptosis mechanisms in target cells (Manning et al. 2002). In contrast with findings for pleural mesothelioma, the association between exposure to asbestos and the development of other tumors, such as gastrointestinal and bile duct cancers, has not been univocally demonstrated (Gamble 1994).

The putative increased risk of bile duct cancer in subjects exposed to asbestos may be due to different mechanisms. The asbestos fibers cross the alveolar barrier by inhalation or penetrate the gastrointestinal mucosa by ingestion. They then reach the interstitial environment and circulatory system through lymphatic vessels and are finally delivered to all tissues, namely the liver and bile ducts (Miserocchi et al. 2008), where they may start a malignant transformation process (Wingren 2004). In addition, asbestos fibers may reach the bile ducts through the papilla of Vater from the intestinal lumen by retrograde reflux, as do bacteria, and remain in the gallbladder for a long time.

In the near future we may have to consider asbestos as another factor accounting for the etiopathogenesis of cholangiocarcinomas that may explain the otherwise mysterious increasing incidence of intrahepatic cholangio carcinomas in Western countries.

References Top

  1. Brandi G, Di Girolamo S, Belpoggi F, Grazi GL, Ercolani G, Biasco G. 2008. Asbestos exposure in patients affected by bile duct tumours [in Italian] Eur J Oncol 13(3):171–179. Find this article online
  2. Carter A. 2008. Learning from history: understanding the carcinogenic risks of nanotechnology J Natl Cancer Inst 100(23):1664–1665. Find this article online
  3. Gamble JF. 1994. Asbestos and colon cancer: a weight of evidence review Environ Health Perspect 102:1038–1050. Find this article online
  4. Khan SA, Toledano MB, Taylor-Robinson SD. 2008. Epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma HPB (Oxford) 10(2):77–82. Find this article online
  5. Manning CB, Vallyathan V, Mossman BT. 2002. Disease caused by asbestos: mechanism of injury and disease development Int Immunopharmacol 2:191–200. Find this article online
  6. Miserocchi G, Sancini G, Mantegazza F, Chiappino G. 2008. Translocation pathways for inhaled asbestos fibers Environ Health 7:4.10.1186/1476-069X-7-4 [Online 24 January 2008] Find this article online
  7. Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WA, Seaton A, et al. 2008. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study Nat Nanotechnol 3(7):423–428. Find this article online
  8. Schmidt CW. 2009. Nanotechnology-related environment, health, and safety research Environ Health Perspect 117:A158–A161. Find this article online
  9. Wingren G. 2004. Mortality and cancer incidence in a Swedish art glassworks—an updated cohort study Int Arch Occup Environ Health 77:599–603. Find this article online
Post Your Note (For Public Viewing)
Compose Your Note
 
Declare any competing interests.
Add a note to this text.
Please follow our guidelines for notes and comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  • Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  • Unsupported assertions or statements
  • Inflammatory or insulting language
Add a note to this text.
You must be logged in to add a note to an article. You may log in by clicking here or cancel this note.
Add a note to this text.
You cannot annotate this area of the document. Close
Add a note to this text.
You cannot create an annotation that spans different sections of the document; please adjust your selection.
Close
Rate This Article
Please follow our guidelines for rating and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Annotation
 
Declare any competing interests.