Search
Advanced Search
Share this Article info
  • Facebook StumbleUpon Connotea CiteULike Bibliography

Open Access

Correspondence

Food Additives and Hyperactivity

Bernard Weiss

Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, E-mail:bernard_weiss@urmc.rochester.edu

In the December 2007 Forum article on the links between food additives and hyperactivity, Barrett (2007) offered a somewhat distorted perspective on the public health implications of these additives. Barrett described a clinical trial testing the proposition that consumption of a blend of artificial food flavors and sodium benzoate induces changes in children’s behavior (McCann et al. 2007). The results of that study support such a claim.

Barrett (2007) fumbled the significance of the trial (McCann et al. 2007) for environmental health. The Forum article emphasized how food additives might contribute to the clinical diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder rather than on the more significant finding that food additives, particularly synthetic colors at levels prevailing in the diet, induce adverse behavioral responses. This is hardly a novel finding. In 1980, such effects were documented in two different groups of subjects with two different experimental designs (Swanson and Kinsbourne 1980;Weiss et al. 1980). Many later publications have confirmed their results. I briefly reviewed the data in Environmental Health Perspectives(Weiss 2000).

According to Barrett (2007), a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official, Mike Herndon, maintains that the agency sees “… no reason at this time to change our conclusions that the ingredients that were tested in this study that currently are permitted for food use in the United States are safe for the general population.” This is a rather baffling statement. In fact, our study (Weiss et al. 1980) was funded by the FDA, and its results, along with a number of others from that period, definitively demonstrated adverse behavioral effects of synthetic food colors (Weiss 1982). During the intervening years, with a plethora of confirmations, the FDA has remained blindly obstinate. It continues to shield food additives from testing for neurotoxicity and apparently believes that adverse behavioral responses are not an expression of toxicity.

Herndon and the FDA should seriously consider what the late Philip Handler said about balancing risks and benefits:

The FDA has never clarified the health benefits of artificial food colors.

References Top

  1. Barrett JR. 2007. Hyperactive ingredients? Environ Health Perspect 115:A578.18087571 Find this article online
  2. Handler P 1979. Some comments on risk. The National Research Council in 1979; Current Issues and Studies. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. pp. 3–24.
  3. McCann D, Barrett A, Cooper A, Crumpler D, Dalen L, Grimshaw K, et al. 2007. Food additives and hyperactive behaviour in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children in the community: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial Lancet 370:1560–1567.17825405 Find this article online
  4. Swanson JM, Kinsbourne M. 1980. Food dyes impair performance of hyperactive children on a laboratory learning test Science 207:1485–1487.7361102 Find this article online
  5. Weiss B. 1982. Food additives and environmental chemicals as sources of childhood behavior disorders J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 21:144–152.7069080 Find this article online
  6. Weiss B. 2000. Vulnerability of children and the developing brain to neurotoxic hazards Environ Health Perspect 108(suppl 3):375–381.10852831 Find this article online
  7. Weiss B, Williams JH, Margen S, Abrams B, Caan B, Citron LJ, et al. 1980. Behavioral responses to artificial food colors Science 207:1487–1489.7361103 Find this article online
Post Your Note (For Public Viewing)
Compose Your Note
 
Declare any competing interests.
Add a note to this text.
Please follow our guidelines for notes and comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  • Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  • Unsupported assertions or statements
  • Inflammatory or insulting language
Add a note to this text.
You must be logged in to add a note to an article. You may log in by clicking here or cancel this note.
Add a note to this text.
You cannot annotate this area of the document. Close
Add a note to this text.
You cannot create an annotation that spans different sections of the document; please adjust your selection.
Close
Rate This Article
Please follow our guidelines for rating and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
  1. Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
  2. Unsupported assertions or statements
  3. Inflammatory or insulting language
Compose Your Annotation
 
Declare any competing interests.