Open Access

Research Article

Materials and Methods Top

Chemicals

3-(4-methylbenzylidene) camphor (4-MBC; Eusolex 6300 CAS no. 36861-47-9, purity 99.7–99.9%) was purchased from Merck (Dietikon, Switzerland) and 17β-estradiol (E₂) from Calbiochem (Lucerne, Switzerland).

Experimental animals

Long Evans rats purchased from Møllegaard Breeding and Research Centre (Ejby, Denmark) were bred under controlled illumination (lights on 0200–1600 hours) and temperature (22°C ± 1°C) with free access to food and water. The animal facility is run by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, University of Zurich. Microbiological checks are performed every 3 months.

Animal welfare.

Animals were treated humanely and with regard for alleviation of suffering, in line with the Swiss Law for the Protection of Animals (Tierschutzgesetz, 9 March 1978) and the Ethical Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of the Swiss Academy for Medical Sciences. The project (no. 132/2003) was approved and regularly supervised by the Committee for Animal Experimentation of the State of Zurich and the Veterinary Office of the State of Zurich.

Experimental design

Food pellets containing 4-MBC.

Food pellets with 4-MBC were prepared by Provimi Kliba AG (Kaiseraugst, Switzerland). 4-MBC was dissolved in cold-pressed soy oil (Morga; Ebnat-Kappel, Switzerland) and added to Provimi Kliba chow 3340 to achieve 4-MBC concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 0.33, and 0.66 g/kg chow, yielding an average daily intake of 0.7, 7, 24, or 47 mg/kg/day. Control pellets consisted of the same matrix (Provimi Kliba 3340) with 1% of soil oil added. The soy oil preparation (Morga) was devoid of detectable amounts of phyto-estrogens (manufacturer’s information).

4-MBC treatment.

We designed the study to mimic exposure through the food chain. It followed the design of a two-generation test without F₂. Males and females of the parent generation (5–6 weeks old) were fed for at least 10 weeks before mating with chow containing 4-MBC (0.01, 0.1, 0.33, and 0.66 g/kg chow) or with control chow. Treatment continued throughout pregnancy and lactation and in the offspring until adulthood. Pregnant dams were weighed on gestational day (GD)1 (GD1 = 24 hr after onset of mating), GD7, 14, and 22. Offspring were counted on the day of birth [postnatal day (PND)1 = GD23), and sexed and adjusted to 8–10 animals/litter on PND2. Body weight was recorded on PND2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, at puberty onset, and in adulthood. After weaning (PND28), males and females were raised separately. Additional parameters studied include sex ratio, survival rate, righting reflex, anogenital distance, and eye opening (Durrer 2004). Onset of puberty (preputial separation, vaginal opening) was investigated in males from PND41 and in females from PN30. Experiment A, control A, together with 7, 24, and 47 mg/kg 4-MBC, and experiment B, control B, together with 0.7 mg/kg 4-MBC, were run separately (Table 1).

Male offspring used for molecular biological analysis of prostate were taken from the same litters as the females (Durrer et al. 2005). Brain regions of the same male and female offspring were also analyzed (Maerkel et al. 2005, 2007). For analysis of male reproductive organ weights and puberty, offspring from additional litters were included.

Adult offspring under baseline conditions

Adult offspring under baseline conditions were raised without further experimental manipulation except 4-MBC treatment and sacrificed at 12 weeks by decapitation during light ether anesthesia. The ventral lobe of prostate (ventral prostate) and the combined dorsal + lateral lobes (dorsolateral prostate) were dissected according to J. Ashby (personal communication). Dorsal and lateral lobes were cut inside the borderline with adjacent tissue to avoid contaminations and achieve identical preparation times for ventral and dorsal + lateral lobes. Therefore, wet weight was determined only for ventral lobe. Weights of dorsal + lateral and ventral lobes were determined in 13-month-old 4-MBC–exposed offspring in an additional series (Supplemental material; http://www.ehponline.org/members/2007/91​34/suppl.pdf ). Both tissue pieces were immediately frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen.

Estrogen challenge experiment

Acute responsiveness of estrogen target genes was analyzed in castrated rat offspring. Castration reduces and stabilizes endogenous androgens and androgen-derived estrogens. The same protocol was applied to female offspring (Durrer et al. 2005; Maerkel et al. 2005, 2007) to compare target gene responses in both sexes. At 10 weeks, male offspring were taken out of several litters of control and 4-MBC–exposed groups (0.01, 0.1, and 0.33 g/kg chow) and castrated under anesthesia 150 μL/100 g body weight sc of an acqueous solution containing 12.5% Hypnorm (Janssen-Cilag, Baar, Switzerland), 12.5% Domitor (Pfizer, Zurich, Switzerland) and 2.5% atropin (Pharmacy of the University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland). After 2 weeks recovery (age 12 weeks), they received an sc injection of E₂ [10 or 50 μg/kg in dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO)] or vehicle (DMSO) (injection volume 1 μL/g body weight) and were decapitated 6 hr later. Effects on prostate were studied in ventral lobe because dissection was faster and could be better fitted to a strict time schedule. Animals from the same litters were studied under baseline conditions.

Quantification of mRNA by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Real-time RT-PCR was performed as described previously (Durrer et al. 2005). Prostate tissues were homogenized in lysis tissue buffer from RNeasy-mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) by polytron rotor-stator homogenizer; total RNA isolated according to manufacturers’s specifications (QIAGEN). Genomic DNA was digested by DNase-I (QIAGEN). Quality and concentration of RNA were determined by measuring absorbance at 260 and 280 nm, and RNA integrity was confirmed by an ethidium bromide-stained 2.5% agarose gel. RNA was stored at −80°C. For reverse transcription, 10 μg RNA was used in a total volume of 100 μL containing 1 × TaqMan RT buffer (Applied Biosystems, Rotkreuz, Switzerland), 5.5 mM MgCl₂, 500 μM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 2.5 μM random hexamer primers, 0.4 μM RNase inhibitor, and 1.25 μL MultiScribe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems). The mixture was incubated 10 min at 25°C followed by 30 min RT at 48°C and 5 min RT inactivation at 95°C. RT samples were frozen at −80°C. Primers and probes were designed using Primer Express 2.0 software (Applied Biosystems) and were synthesized by Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). Sequences are summarized in Table 2. RT-PCR cycle parameters were an initial denaturating step at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min in ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems).

Sequence Detector Software SDS 2.0 (Applied Biosystems) was used for data analysis. mRNAs were quantitated according to the standard curve method and normalized to cyclophilin. Cyclophilin was chosen as reference because it was found not to be affected by manipulations of gonadal hormones (Durrer et al. 2005). mRNA levels of ventral prostates of intact and castrated rats were compared with the comparative C_t method. Δ C_t is the difference of the C_t values of the target gene and of the reference gene (cyclophilin). The difference between paired tissue samples (control and treated) is then obtained as ΔΔ C_t = [ Δ C_t (control tissue) − Δ C_t (treated tissue)]. For a given gene, the n-fold differential expression of a test sample compared with the control was expressed as 2^−ΔΔCt (Applied Biosystems 2001).

Western blot analysis

Protein levels were analyzed in the same tissue homogenates as used for mRNA analysis. Because RNA stability is most critical, tissue was homogenized in RNA lysis buffer. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, München, Germany) using lyophilized bovine serum albumin (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) as standard. For acetone precipitation of protein from buffer RLT lysates, the QIAGEN protocol (http://www1.qiagen.com/literature/protoc​ols/pdf/RY22.pdf ) was used. After addition of 200 mM dithiothreitol (Fluka), samples (20 μg protein) were subjected to 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; Precise Protein Gels; PIERCE Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). The running buffer contained 100 mM Tris base, 100 mM Hepes, 3 mM SDS. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) in a Trans-Blot apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories). After transfer, membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20 (blocking buffer). Membranes were then incubated overnight with the first antibody diluted in blocking buffer. Anti-ER-α and anti-androgen receptor (AR) (ABR-Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO, USA) were diluted 1:5000, ER-β, steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) and antinuclear receptor co-repressor (N-CoR) (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) 1:2,000, 1:2,500, and 1:1,000 respectively, anti-actin (Chemicon Int., Temecula, CA, USA) 1:100,000, anti-cyclophilin A (Upstate Cell Signaling Solutions, Lake Placid, NY, USA) 1:10,000. After three washes with blocking buffer diluted 1:5 with TBS, membranes were incubated for 2 hr with the appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Proteins were detected using chemiluminescence (Pierce). Densitometrical analyses were performed using AIDA-2D software (Ray-test, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Molecular masses were verified by using prestained SDS-PAGE standards [Broad Range (myosin 204 Da to aprotinin 7 Da)] from Bio-Rad Laboratories. Binding specificity of antibodies for the respective proteins was examined with a negative control sample. Results are expressed as ratio of the protein of interest to actin to correct for possible differences of protein loading between samples. Values of treated samples were expressed as percentage of the mean of the control group loaded on the same blot (control A and 7- or 24-mg/kg group, control B and 0.7-mg/kg group). Gels run in duplicate for the same two treatment groups yielded analogous effect patterns. All proteins showed specific signals (Figure 1)with molecular weights of the expected size described in the literature and according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Several possible reference proteins were studied, including β-tubulin used on uterus (Durrer et al. 2005). Actin was found to be more appropriate for prostate tissues. The reliability of actin was checked by three approaches: a) General specificity checks; with the antibody used, a clear and consistent protein signal was obtained (Figure 1). b) Absolute values of actin did not differ between controls (CON) and 4-MBC-exposed groups analyzed in the same blot of dorsolateral prostate (Table 3). c) Actin was compared with cyclophilin, which is not influenced by estrogen (Durrer et al. 2005), in the same blot of dorsolateral prostate with samples from control and treated animals. The ratio cyclophilin protein/actin protein was the same in controls and 4-MBC-exposed groups (Table 3). Thus, actin was equivalent to cyclophilin in the present setup. The latter could not be used as reference because its molecular weight differs considerably from that of target proteins.

Statistics

Series A (untreated control A, 7, 24, 47 mg/kg 4-MBC) and B (untreated control B, 0.7 mg/kg 4-MBC) were analyzed separately because they had been conducted during different periods. Individual mRNA was normalized to cyclophilin mRNA and expressed as percentage of the respective control (A, B). Body weight, organ weights, and mRNA were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni pair-wise comparisons and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test for series A (control A vs. treated groups), and by Student’s t-test for series B (control B vs. 0.7 mg/kg group). Western-blot gels comprised a lane of controls (A or B) and a lane of samples of one treatment group. Values of treated samples were expressed as percentage of the mean of control samples of individual gels. Differences between control (A or B) and treated group of individual gels were assessed by Student’s t-test. Preputial separation and vaginal opening exhibited positively skewed distributions also in controls, and were analyzed with non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. (GraphPad Prism 4; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA ).

Results Top

Onset of puberty and reproductive organ weights

4-MBC was administered to rats in chow, to the parent generation before mating, during pregnancy and lactation, and to the offspring until adulthood (12 weeks) (Table 1). The treatment delayed puberty onset in males (preputial separation) at and above 7 mg/kg (Table 4, not analyzed with 0.7 mg/kg). Two separate experiments started in summer 2001 and spring 2002 yielded identical results (Table 4). Body weight at onset of puberty was at control level in males, but slightly reduced in females. Adult body weights of 4-MBC–exposed offspring were in the control range (Table 5; Durrer et al. 2005).

Ventral prostate weight decreased in adult offspring exposed to 7–47 mg/kg 4-MBC (Table 5). Investigations in 13-month-old offspring showed that 4-MBC reduced both, ventral as well as dorsal + lateral prostate weight (Appendix). Absolute testis weight was slightly increased (Table 5). Epididymis and seminal vesicle weights were unaffected except for relative epididymis weight at 47 mg/kg. Higher doses of 4-MBC (24, 47 mg/kg) increased thyroid weight (Maerkel et al. 2007). Liver weight remained unchanged (data not shown).

Effect of pre- and postnatal exposure to 4-MBC on gene expression in prostate lobes of adult rat offspring

mRNA and protein levels were determined in the same samples of ventral prostate and dorsolateral prostate (dorsal + lateral lobes) in 12-week-old offspring under baseline conditions (Table 6; Figures 1 and 2). AR mRNA and protein levels were reduced (Figures 2, 3). ER-α expression was lower in ventral than dorsolateral prostate (Table 6; Lau et al. 1998). 4-MBC down-regulated ER-α mRNA in both tissues. A decrease in ER-α protein was observed in dorsolateral prostate; in ventral prostate, the protein was not detectable. ER-β mRNA was down-regulated in both prostate parts, but protein was increased in dorsolateral prostate at 7 mg/kg and unchanged in ventral prostate (Figure 3). The increase in ER-β protein coincided with the lowest level of AR protein. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) mRNA was dose dependently down-regulated. Effects of 4-MBC on all four genes were greater in dorsolateral prostate.

Acute response to E₂ in adult castrated rat offspring

To examine changes in responsiveness of estrogen-regulated genes to E₂ in ventral prostate, offspring from different litters of untreated control groups A and B and 0.7, 7, and 24 mg/kg/day 4-MBC treatment groups were castrated at 70 days of age, and after 2 weeks recovery, injected with E₂ (10 or 50 μg/kg, sc) 6 hr before sacrifice (Table 1).

Effects of castration were analyzed by comparing mRNA levels in ventral prostate of intact adult control offspring with levels in vehicle-injected castrated control offspring (comparative C_t method). Castration increased ER-α, AR, and IGF-1 mRNAs and reduced ER-β mRNA (Table 7). Transcript levels of castrated, vehicle-injected groups, which represent the reference level of E₂ challenge experiments, did not differ significantly between controls and 4-MBC–exposed groups, except for ER-β mRNA at 0.7 mg/kg (Table 8).

Effect of injection of E₂

IGF-1 mRNA was down-regulated in ventral prostate of castrated controls 6 hr after injection of E₂ (10 or 50 μg/kg, sc), relative to the vehicle group (Figure 4A). An analogous effect of E₂ was observed in 4-MBC–exposed males, except for one injection group (10 μg/kg E₂, 24 mg/kg 4-MBC). However, the magnitude of the suppressive effect of E₂ on IGF-1 mRNA was dose dependently reduced compared with the E₂ effect in controls (Figure 4B). AR mRNA was down-regulated by both doses of E₂ in controls, whereas 4-MBC-exposed animals responded to only 10 μg/kg E₂ (Figure 5A). The suppression of AR mRNA by 50 μg/kg E₂ was significantly smaller in 4-MBC–exposed offspring.

ER-α mRNA was down-regulated by E₂ (Figure 5B). ER-β mRNA levels were not significantly changed by E₂ in controls, whereas a small repressive effect was visible in some 4-MBC–exposed groups (signficant at 24 mg/kg after 10 μg/kg E₂. Figure 5C). In contrast to AR and IGF-1, effects of E₂ on mRNAs encoding for ER-α and ER-β did not differ significantly between control and 4-MBC–exposed offspring.

Co-regulator protein levels

In 4-MBC–exposed female littermates, SRC-1 protein levels were decreased in uterus (Durrer et al. 2005). This was correlated with reduced inductive effects of E₂ on progesterone receptor and IGF-1. SRC-1 protein levels were not significantly affected in prostate (Figure 6), but N-CoR protein levels were reduced after exposure to 0.7, 7 and 24 mg/kg 4-MBC (Figure 6), to 55.3, 64.5, and 76.1% in dorsolateral prostate, and 102.4, 85.8, and 75.8% in ventral prostate, respectively.

Discussion Top

The present study indicates that exposure to the UV filter 4-MBC throughout ontogeny until adulthood affects male sexual development in rats, puberty, reproductive organ weights, expression, and estrogen sensitivity of estrogen-regulated genes in prostate and N-CoR protein levels. Gene expression is also altered in uterus of female littermates (Durrer et al. 2005) and in brain of the same animals (Maerkel et al. 2005, 2007).

Developmental exposure to estrogenic substances can delay puberty in male rats (Biegel et al. 1998; Masutomi et al. 2003), but data are conflicting [for genistein, see Masutomi et al. (2003) and Wisniewski et al. (2003)], and in part negative (Putz et al. 2001b; Takagi et al. 2004). Observations on hepatic testosterone hydroxylase in prepubertal males indicate that effects of neonatal estrogen may vary with dose (Putz et al. 2001b). The delay of male puberty by 4-MBC, which binds to ER (Schlumpf et al. 2004a) but not AR (Ma et al. 2003), may be linked with its estrogenic activity, but it should be noted that the chemical also interacts with the thyroid axis (Maerkel et al. 2007; Schlumpf et al. 2004b; Schmutzler et al. 2004). The changes in testis weight decrease at PN14 (Schlumpf et al. 2001b), and the slight increase that occurs in adulthood may also be linked with estrogenic activity, as testis weight was reduced on day 18 after neonatal diethylstilbestrol (Atanassova et al. 2000) and increased in adulthood after low-dose neonatal E₂ (Putz et al. 2001b).

Most conspicuous changes were noted in prostate with a marked decrease in weight as demonstrated for ventral prostate and in an additional study also for dorsolateral prostate. Prostate development appears to be enhanced by slightly supernormal estrogen levels (Nagel et al. 1997; Timms et al. 1999; vom Saal et al. 1997) but inhibited by higher estrogen levels (Prins 1992; Putz et al. 2001a). Activational responses to androgens are similarly enhanced or reduced (Naslund and Coffey 1986; Rajfer and Coffey 1978). Because 4-MBC does not bind to AR (Ma et al. 2003), the reduction in prostate weight probably resulted from its estrogenic activity. The 4-MBC-induced reduction of AR may also be involved. Effects of 4-MBC resembled developmental low-dose actions of estrogen with respect to testis but high-dose actions with respect to puberty and prostate weight, suggesting differences in sensitivity of target systems.

The changes in gene expression in prostate of adult offspring may have resulted from effects of 4-MBC during ontogeny, from ongoing exposure in adulthood or from a combination of both. mRNAs encoding for IGF-1, AR, ER-α, and ER-β, and AR and ER-α proteins were down-regulated in dorsolateral and ventral prostate, with statistical significance of changes in mRNA and protein at the same dose levels. The reduction of ER-β mRNA is reminiscent of observations after neonatal estrogen treatment (Prins et al. 1998). Dose–response curves appear to be monotonic, with the exception of ER-β protein and possibly N-CoR in dorsolateral prostate. The increase in ER-β protein at 7 mg/kg, with mRNA at control level, is not explainable. It might reflect combined effects on receptor synthesis and degradation. 4-MBC exhibits partial agonist features (Schlumpf et al. 2001a), and partial agonists can inhibit proteasomal ER degradation (Fan et al. 2004; Laios et al. 2003), but this should influence also ER-β in ventral prostate and ER-α levels.

Lowest AR protein levels coincided with the ER-β peak in dorsolateral prostate. Mice lacking ER-β exhibit AR up-regulation in prostate (Cheng G et al. 2002). Because 4-MBC is a preferential ER-β ligand (Schlumpf et al. 2004a), actions mediated by ER-β may have contributed to reduced AR expression. AR mRNA is also down-regulated by genistein, considered to be an ER-β ligand (Fritz et al. 2002). However, expression of AR probably was affected by additional mechanisms such as impairment of prostate development through effects on ER-α. Neonatal exposure to estrogenic substances can lead to reduced or enhanced AR expression in adulthood (Prins and Birch 1995; vom Saal et al. 1997). The difference has been ascribed exclusively to dosage, but preference of a lig-and for ER-α or ER-β might also influence the effect pattern. Provided they were already present in early life, the down-regulation of AR, ER-α and IGF-1 may all have contributed to impaired prostate development. ER-α has been associated with proliferation and branching (Asano et al. 2003; Omoto et al. 2005), IGF-1 also influences prostate development and appears to be involved in enhanced branching in response to estrogen (Gupta 2000; Torring et al. 1997).

Endocrine regulation may be disturbed by changes in estrogen sensitivity of target genes. To obtain information on this aspect, the effect of E₂ on gene expression in ventral prostate was studied in an acute challenge experiment in littermates of the males studied under baseline conditions. Endogenous hormone levels were reduced and stabilized by castration. Castration-induced changes in AR, ER-α and ER-β and IGF-1 mRNA expression corresponded to previous observations (Asano et al. 2003; Bacher et al. 1993; Nickerson et al. 1999). Acute E₂ injection elicited the expected down-regulation of AR mRNA, which may be mediated via ER-β (Weihua et al. 2002). A suppressive effect of E₂ on IGF-1 has previously been observed in prostate in the absence of testosterone (Nellemann et al. 2005) and is also indicated by observations with the antiestrogen ICI 182,780 (Huynh et al. 2001). Exposure to 4-MBC reduced the suppressive effect of E₂ on both, AR and IGF-1 mRNA expression, indicating a reduction of sensitivity of the two genes to the natural estrogen. In contrast, down-regulation of ER-α and ER-β by E₂ remained unaffected. The direction of change in estrogen sensitivity induced by 4-MBC was the same in uterus (Durrer et al. 2005).

Since ER-β mRNA was not significantly changed in vehicle-injected castrated animals by 7 or 24 mg/kg 4-MBC, the reduced repressive effect of E₂ on AR cannot be ascribed to changes ER-β (Weihua et al. 2002). Sensitivity to steroid hormones also depends on availability of steroid receptor coregulators. 4-MBC–induced changes of coactivator SRC-1 levels in uterus (Durrer et al. 2005) prompted us to investigate nuclear receptor coregulator expression in prostate. In addition to the coactivator SRC-1 (McKenna and O’Malley 2002), the corepressor N-CoR was studied because effects of hydroxytamoxifen (Lavinsky et al. 1998; Shang et al. 2000) suggested the possibility of effects of 4-MBC, which shows partial ER agonist characteristics (Schlumpf et al. 2001a). The 4-MBC–induced down-regulation of N-CoR protein might explain reduced gene repression by E₂, which recruits N-CoR (Stossi et al. 2006), but N-CoR levels in castrated rats could not be determined because the small amount of ventral prostate homogenate allowed only mRNA analyses. Reduced baseline AR levels in presence of reduced sensitivity to E₂ and N-CoR levels indicate that the chronic condition probably resulted from a combination of multiple developmental and adult processes (Weihua et al. 2001; Woodham et al. 2003).

Our data demonstrate that N-CoR is a target of endocrine disruptors. N-CoR protein is reduced by acute administration of E₂ in MCF-7 cells (Frasor et al. 2005) and by chronic hydroxytamoxifen in a mouse tumor model (Lavinsky et al. 1998). The effect of E₂ was attributed to up-regulation of ubiquitin ligase and targeting of N-CoR for proteasomal degradation. Down-regulation of N-CoR may have implications for gene expression on a broad scale because N-CoR is recruited by many transcription factors, it also interacts with AR (Cheng S et al. 2002; Hodgson et al. 2005). Changes in N-CoR levels may be relevant for prostate ontogeny and adult function.

In conclusion, our data indicate that pre-and postnatal exposure of rats to 4-MBC interferes with male sexual development. Classical end points showed a lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of 7 mg/kg and a NOAEL of 0.7 mg/kg; molecular end points (N-CoR) a LOAEL of 0.7 mg/kg. These doses are 30 and 3 times above an estimated human exposure level of 0.23 mg/kg (Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products 1998). Thus, the margin of safety (MOS = NOAEL/exposure × 100) may not be reached. However, we think that risk considerations should be based on a comparison of internal exposure levels in humans and experimental animals. Adipose tissue levels of 4-MBC in adult rat offspring were 449 ng/g lipid at 7 mg/kg (Schlumpf et al. 2004b), close to fish levels (44–166 ng/g lipid, Balmer et al. 2005). To obtain information on internal human exposure, a monitoring study on human milk is presently being conducted.

Table 1.

Treatment schedules.

Table 2.

Forward primers (FP), reverse primers (RP), and TaqMan probes with corresponding GenBank accession number.

Table 3.

Analysis of actin as reference protein in dorsolateral prostate (Western blots)

Table 4.

Onset of puberty in male (preputial separation) and female rat offspring (vaginal opening)

Table 5.

Reproductive organ weights and body weight in 12-week-old male rat offspring after pre- and postnatal exposure to 4-MBC.

Table 6.

mRNA levels in prostate lobes of adult control rat offspring.

Table 7.

mRNA levels in ventral prostate of intact and castrated adult male control offspring.

Table 8.

mRNA levels in adult control and 4-MBC-exposed male rat offspring after castration and vehicle injection.

Supplemental Material Top

(140 KB) PDF.

References Top

1. Applied Biosystems 2001. User Bulletin #2. Available: http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/ [accessed 17 July 2007]
2. Asano K, Maruyama S, Usui T, Fujimoto N. 2003. Regulation of estrogen receptor alpha and beta expression by testosterone in the rat prostate gland Endocr J 50:281–287.12940456 Find this article online
3. Atanassova N, McKinnell C, Turner KJ, Walker M, Fisher JS, Morley M, et al. 2000. Comparative effects of neonatal exposure of male rats to potent and weak (environmental) estrogens on spermatogenesis at puberty and the relationship to adult testis size and fertility: evidence for stimulatory effects of low estrogen levels Endocrinology 141:3898–3907.11014247 Find this article online
4. Bacher M, Rausch U, Goebel HW, Polzar B, Mannherz HG, Aumuller G. 1993. Stromal and epithelial cells from rat ventral prostate during androgen deprivation and estrogen treatment—regulation of transcription Exp Clin Endocrinol 101:78–86.8405143 Find this article online
5. Balmer ME, Buser HR, Muller MD, Poiger T. 2005. Occurrence of some organic UV filters in wastewater, in surface waters, and in fish from Swiss Lakes Environ Sci Technol 39:953–962.15773466 Find this article online
6. Biegel LB, Flaws JA, Hirshfield AN, O’Connor JC, Elliott GS, Ladics GS, et al. 1998. 90-day feeding and one-generation reproduction study in Crl:CD BR rats with 17β-estradiol Toxicol Sci 44:116–142.9742652 Find this article online
7. Cheng G, Weihua Z, Makinen S, Makela S, Saji S, Warner M, et al. 2002. A role for the androgen receptor in follicular atresia of estrogen receptor beta knockout mouse ovary Biol Reprod 66:77–84.11751267 Find this article online
8. Cheng S, Brzostek S, Lee SR, Hollenberg AN, Balk SP. 2002. Inhibition of the dihydrotestosterone-activated androgen receptor by nuclear receptor corepressor Mol Endocrinol 16:1492–1501.12089345 Find this article online
9. Durrer S 2004. Developmental Toxicity of 4-methylbenzylidene Camphor and Different Endocrine Active Chemicals: Steroid Hormone-Regulated Gene Expression in Reproductive Organs of Rats. PhD Thesis no. 15544. Zurich: Swiss Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH).
10. Durrer S, Maerkel K, Schlumpf M, Lichtensteiger W. 2005. Estrogen target gene regulation and coactivator expression in rat uterus after developmental exposure to the ultraviolet filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor Endocrinology 146:2130–2139.15705771 Find this article online
11. Fan M, Nakshatri H, Nephew KP. 2004. Inhibiting proteasomal proteolysis sustains estrogen receptor-alpha activation Mol Endocrinol 18:2603–2615.15284335 Find this article online
12. Frasor J, Danes JM, Funk CC, Katzenellenbogen BS. 2005. Estrogen down-regulation of the corepressor N-CoR: mechanism and implications for estrogen derepression of N-CoR-regulated genes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13153–13157.16141343 Find this article online
13. Fritz WA, Wang J, Eltoum IE, Lamartiniere CA. 2002. Dietary genistein down-regulates androgen and estrogen receptor expression in the rat prostate Mol Cell Endocrinol 186:89–99.11850125 Find this article online
14. Gupta C. 2000. The role of estrogen receptor, androgen receptor and growth factors in diethylstilbestrol-induced programming of prostate differentiation Urol Res 28:223–229.11011959 Find this article online
15. Hayden CGJ, Roberts MS, Benson HAE. 1997. Systemic absorption of sunscreen after topical application Lancet 350:863–864.9310609 Find this article online
16. Hodgson MC, Astapova I, Cheng S, Lee LJ, Verhoeven MC, Choi E, et al. 2005. The androgen receptor recruits nuclear receptor CoRepressor (N-CoR) in the presence of mifepristone via its N and C termini revealing a novel molecular mechanism for androgen receptor antagonists J Biol Chem 280:6511–6519.15598662 Find this article online
17. Holbech H, Norum U, Korsgaard B, Bjerregard P. 2002. The chemical UV-filter 3-benzylidene camphor causes an oestrogenic effect in in vivo fish assay Pharmacol Toxicol 91:204–208.12530472 Find this article online
18. Huynh H, Alpert I, Alaoui-Jamali MA, Ng CY, Chan TWM. 2001. Co-administration of finasteride and the pure anti-oestrogen ICI 182,780 act synergistically in modulating the IGF system in rat prostate J Endocrinol 171:109–118.11572795 Find this article online
19. Inui M, Adachi T, Takenaka S, Inui H, Nakazawa M, Ueda M, et al. 2003. Effect of UV screens and preservatives on vitellogenin and choriogenin production in male medaka (Oryzias latipes) Toxicology 194:43–50.14636695 Find this article online
20. Janjua NR, Mogensen B, Andersson AM, Petersen JH, Henriksen M, Skakkebaek NE, et al. 2004. Systemic absorption of the sunscreens benzophenone-3, octyl-methoxycinnamate, and 3-(4-methyl-benzylidene) camphor after whole body topical application and reproductive hormone levels in humans J Invest Dermatol 123:57–61.15191542 Find this article online
21. Kawamura Y, Ogawa Y, Nishimura T, Kikuchi Y, Nishikawa J, Nishihara T, et al. 2003. Estrogenic activities of UV stabilizers used in food contact plastics and benzophenone derivatives tested by the yeast two-hybrid assay J Health Sci 49:205–212. Find this article online
22. Laios I, Journe F, Laurent G, Nonclercq D, Toillon R-A, Seo H-S, et al. 2003. Mechanisms governing the accumulation of estrogen receptor alpha in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with hydroxytamoxifen and related antiestrogens J. Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 87:207–221.14672741 Find this article online
23. Lau KM, Leav I, Ho SM. 1998. Rat estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta, and progesterone receptor mRNA expression in various prostatic lobes and microdissected normal and dysplastic epithelial tissues of the Noble rats Endocrinology 139:424–427.9421443 Find this article online
24. Lavinsky RM, Jepsen K, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Mullen TM, Schiff R, et al. 1998. Diverse signaling pathways modulate nuclear receptor recruitment of N-CoR and SMRT complexes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2920–2925.9501191 Find this article online
25. Ma R, Cotton B, Lichtensteiger W, Schlumpf M. 2003. UV filters with antagonistic action at androgen receptors in the MDA-kb2 cell transcriptional-activation assay Toxicol Sci 74:43–50.12730620 Find this article online
26. Maerkel K, Durrer S, Henseler M, Schlumpf M, Lichtensteiger W. 2007. Sexually dimorphic gene regulation in brain as a target for endocrine disrupters: developmental exposure of rats to 4-methylbenzylidene camphor Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 218:152–165.17188730 Find this article online
27. Maerkel K, Lichtensteiger W, Durrer S, Conscience M, Schlumpf M. 2005. Sex- and region-specific alterations of progesterone receptor mRNA levels and estrogen sensitivity in rat brain following developmental exposure to the estrogenic UV filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 19:761–765. Find this article online
28. Masutomi N, Shibutani M, Takagi H, Uneyama C, Takahashi N, Hirose M. 2003. Impact of dietary exposure to methoxychlor, genistein, or diisononyl phthalate during the perinatal period on the development of the rat endocrine/reproductive systems in later life Toxicology 192:149–170.14580783 Find this article online
29. McKenna NJ, O’Malley BW. 2002. Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors and coregulators Cell 108:465–474.11909518 Find this article online
30. Mueller SO, Kling M, Firzani PA, Mecky A, Duranti E, Shields-Botella J, et al. 2003. Activation of estrogen receptor α and Erβ by 4-methylbenzylidene—camphor in human and rat cells: comparison with phyto- and xenoestrogens Toxicol Lett 142:89–101.12765243 Find this article online
31. Nagel SC, vom Saal FS, Thayer KA, Dhar MG, Boechler M, Welshons WV. 1997. Relative binding affinity-serum modified access (RBA-SMA) assay predicts the relative in vivo bioactivity of the xenoestrogens bisphenol A and octylphenol Environ Health Perspect 105:70–76.9074884 Find this article online
32. Nagtegaal M, Ternes TA, Baumann W, Nagel R. 1997. UV-Filter-substanzen in Wasser und Fischen UWSF-Z Umweltchem Ökotox 9:79–86. Find this article online
33. Naslund MJ, Coffey DS. 1986. The differential effects of neonatal androgen, estrogen and progesterone on adult rat prostate growth J Urol 136:1136–1140.3773083 Find this article online
34. Nellemann C, Dalgaard M, Holst B, Bonefeld-Jrgensen EC, Vinggaard AM. 2005. Gene expression changes in rat prostate after activation or blocking of the androgen and estrogen receptor Mol Cell Endocrinol 237:25–35.15925091 Find this article online
35. Nickerson T, Miyake H, Gleave ME, Pollak M. 1999. Castration-induced apoptosis of androgen-dependent shionogi carcinoma is associated with increased expression of genes encoding insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins Cancer Res 59:3392–3395.10416600 Find this article online
36. Omoto Y, Imamov O, Warner M, Gustafsson J-A. 2005. Estrogen receptor α and imprinting of the neonatal mouse ventral prostate by estrogen Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:1484–1489.15665095 Find this article online
37. Plagellat C, Kupper T, Furrer R, de Alencastro LF, Grandjean D, Taradellas J. 2006. Concentrations and specific loads of UV filters in sewage sludge originating from a monitoring network in Switzerland Chemosphere 62:915–925.15996716 Find this article online
38. Poiger T, Buser HR, Balmer ME, Bergqvist PA, Muller MD. 2004. Occurrence of UV filter compounds from sunscreens in surface waters: regional mass balance in two Swiss lakes Chemosphere 55:951–963.15051365 Find this article online
39. Prins GS. 1992. Neonatal estrogen exposure induces lobe-specific alterations in adult rat prostate androgen receptor expression Endocrinology 130:3703–3714.1597166 Find this article online
40. Prins GS, Birch L. 1995. The developmental pattern of androgen receptor expression in rat prostate lobes is altered after neonatal exposure to estrogen Endocrinology 136:1303–1314.7867585 Find this article online
41. Prins GS, Marmer M, Woodham C, Chang W, Kuiper G, Gustafsson JA, et al. 1998. Estrogen receptor-beta messenger ribonucleic acid ontogeny in the prostate of normal and neonatally estrogenized rats Endocrinology 139:874–883.9492016 Find this article online
42. Putz O, Schwartz CB, Kim S, LeBlanc GA, Cooper RL, Prins GS. 2001a. Neonatal low- and high-dose exposure to estradiol benzoate in the male rat: I. Effects on the prostate gland Biol Reprod 65:1496–1505.11673267 Find this article online
43. Putz O, Schwartz CB, LeBlanc GA, Cooper RL, Prins GS. 2001b. Neonatal low- and high-dose exposure to estradiol benzoate in the male rat: II. Effects on male puberty and the reproductive tract Biol Reprod 65:1506–1517.11673268 Find this article online
44. Rajfer J, Coffey DS. 1978. Sex steroid imprinting of the immature prostate. Long-term effects Invest Urol 16:186–190.711410 Find this article online
45. Schlumpf M, Berger L, Cotton B, Conscience-Egli M, Durrer S, Fleischmann J, et al. 2001b. Estrogen active UV screens SÖFW-Journal 127:10–15. Find this article online
46. Schlumpf M, Cotton B, Conscience M, Haller V, Steinmann B, Lichtensteiger W. 2001a. In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens Environ Health Perspect 109:239–244.11333184 Find this article online
47. Schlumpf M, Jarry H, Wuttke W, Ma R, Lichtensteiger W. 2004a. Estrogenic activity and estrogen receptor beta binding of the UV filter 3-benzylidene camphor. Comparison with 4-methylbenzylidene camphor Toxicology 199:109–20.15147785 Find this article online
48. Schlumpf M, Schmid P, Durrer S, Conscience M, Maerkel K, Henseler M, et al. 2004b. Endocrine activity and developmental toxicity of cosmetic UV filters-an update Toxicology 205:113–122.15458796 Find this article online
49. Schmutzler C, Hamann I, Hoffmann PJ, Kovacs G, Stemmler L, Mentrup B, et al. 2004. Endocrine active compounds affect thyrotropin and thyroid hormone levels in serum as well as endpoints of thyroid hormone action in liver, heart and kidney Toxicology 205:95–112.15458794 Find this article online
50. Schreurs R, Lauser P, Seinen W, van den Burg B. 2002. Estrogenic activity of UV filters determined by an in vitro reporter gene assay and an in vivo transgenic zebrafish assay Arch Toxicol 76:257–261.12107642 Find this article online
52. Shang Y, Hu X, DiRenzo J, Lazar MA, Brown M. 2000. Cofactor dynamics and sufficiency in estrogen receptor-regulated transcription Cell 103:843–852.11136970 Find this article online
53. Stossi F, Likhite VS, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS. 2006. Estrogen-occupied estrogen receptor represses cyclin G2 gene expression and recruits a repressor complex at the cyclin G2 promoter J Biol Chem 281:16272–16278.16608856 Find this article online
54. Takagi H, Shibutani M, Masutomi N, Uneyama C, Takahashi N, Mitsumori K, et al. 2004. Lack of maternal dietary exposure effects of bisphenol A and nonylphenol during the critical period of brain sexual differentiation on the reproductive/ endocrine systems in later life Arch Toxicol 78:97–105.14520509 Find this article online
55. Timms BG, Petersen SL, vom Saal FS. 1999. Prostate gland growth during development is stimulated in both male and female rat fetuses by intrauterine proximity to female fetuses J Urol 161:1694–1701.10210442 Find this article online
56. Tinwell H, Lefevre PA, Moffat GJ, Burns A, Odum J, Spurway TD, et al. 2002. Confirmation of uterotrophic activity of 3-(4–methylbenzylidene) camphor in the immature rat Environ Health Perspect 110:533–536.12003759 Find this article online
57. Torring N, Vinter-Jensen L, Pedersen SB, Sorensen FB, Flyvbjerg A, Nexo E. 1997. Systemic administration of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) causes growth of the rat prostate J Urol 158:222–227.9186364 Find this article online
58. Vom Saal FS, Timms BG, Montano MN, Palanza P, Thayer P, Nagel SC, et al. 1997. Prostate enlargement in mice due to fetal exposure to low doses of estradiol and diethylstilbestrol and opposite effects at high doses Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2056–2051.9050904 Find this article online
59. Weihua Z, Lathe R, Warner M, Gustafsson JA. 2002. An endocrine pathway in the prostate, ERbeta, AR, 5alpha-androstane-3beta,17beta-diol, and CYP7B1, regulates prostate growth Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:13589–13594.12370428 Find this article online
60. Weihua Z, Makela S, Andersson LC, Salmi S, Saji S, Webster JI, et al. 2001. A role for estrogen receptor beta in the regulation of growth of the ventral prostate Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6330–6335.11371645 Find this article online
61. Wisniewski AB, Klein SL, Lakshmanan Y, Gearhart JP. 2003. Exposure to genistein during gestation and lactation demasculinizes the reproductive system in rats J Urol 169:1582–1586.12629420 Find this article online
62. Woodham C, Birch L, Prins GS. 2003. Neonatal estrogen down-regulates prostatic androgen receptor through a proteosome-mediated protein degradation pathway Endocrinology 144:4841–4850.12960060 Find this article online